How Is Fiction Like Telepathy?

Image licensed by Shutterstock.

Words are powerful things. They whisper to us in the darkness. They seduce us. They cast a glamour over us, drawing us into their web with promises of beauty and escape. There they ensnare us, hold us captive, take control and have their way with us, until at long last, they’ve made us hear and conceptualize all of what they were summoned to express.  Fiction in particular exercises a singularly unique species of sorcery, one that most of us are powerless to resist.

What is this strange and exotic magic?

Stephen King, in his book On Writing, compares the art of storytelling to telepathy. He says that “all the arts depend on telepathy to some degree, but[…]writing offers the purest distillation.” Though his comparison is primarily tongue and cheek, it nevertheless makes a very compelling point.

Stories are a means by which the thoughts in one man’s mind are transferred to another. If, as an author, I were to write about a chair, the instant those words reached your eyes, you would suddenly share my vision, a vision that previously existed only in my mind and which only I could see.  This is, arguably, the mind’s most magical and mystifying skill of all, to be able to communicate, through mere symbols and sounds, thoughts of all kinds — sensory stimuli, emotions and dialog — as well as to be able to receive, decode and reconstruct perceptions from those same symbols and sounds when sent by someone else.

Of course, words are not alone in their expressive power. We have drawings, paintings, photographs and movies, all of which communicate senses, emotions and ideas just as effectively, though in different ways. However, words are alone in their ability to convey a common message, while at the same time allowing for infinite variation in the way that they’re perceived. Everyone sees the same photograph or the same painting. But the sights and sounds that are conjured by one’s mind in response to the words of another always belong entirely to the receiver.

Returning to our previous example, what does the chair I told you about look like? What color is it? What kind of material is it made of? Everybody sees a chair, but nobody sees the same chair. As the author, I can further refine my description. I can tell you to imagine a red wooden chair. But what shade of red is it? What kind of wood is it made of? I can continue to describe the chair in ever increasing detail, but no matter how many words I use, I will never be able to communicate with any real precision the image in my own head, nor will anybody else share yours. The story is mine, but its incarnation belongs entirely to you. This is something that no other medium can accomplish.

The next time you pull out a book and prepare to lose yourself in its dusty ink-bound secrets, you would do well to stop and reflect on what you’re about to do. Understand that you’re about to link mind to mind with the author, living or dead, that a communication is about to take place. Reflect on the power of those seemingly innocuous symbols that are imperfectly stamped upon the pages you hold in your hands and rejoice that you have been endowed with such a profound gift.

Do so in earnest, each and every time you prepare to read, and I promise that your life will never be the same.

Author: Jeff Coleman

Jeff Coleman is a writer who finds himself drawn to the dark and the mysterious, and to all the extraordinary things that regularly hide in the shadow of ordinary life.

6 thoughts on “How Is Fiction Like Telepathy?”

  1. Indeed, words can mean different things to different people. Ask a red.green colour-blind person to describe “red”! They can do it, but it’s evidently profoundly different with different implications for what red suggests to most of us. Ask someone what “religion” means to them – not what their religion is if any, but what the word means. Ask what love is and demand a specific verbal answer!

    1. Yes. When people are discussing different points of view, I sometimes wonder how much the disagreement stems from a different set of beliefs and how much it’s the result of differences in the ways that the words themselves are understood.

  2. Damn this was deep (and I read it before noon, go me). But no seriously, thanks for sharing. This is a really interesting viewpoint. And as much as I read & write, I never thought about it quite like this. I guess it makes sense that we actually feel such a strong connection to some books (and/or movies, albums, etc.).

    I know words can pack a powerful punch even in a small package (like a blog post or short story) but if fiction is like telepathy then it makes sense that some really long books seem to really “transport” people. Like the Harry Potter book, of course the world/characters were well built but they were all so long, and it was a series so the connection readers felt was even stronger (possibly) than a shorter stand-alone book. Just me semi theory piggy backing on this one lol, not concrete I know.

    1. Hey Candace, that was plenty concrete 😉 I think there’s some truth to that. I think also that, for the long books or series that we continue reading, there’s an investment that pulls us further in; the more we know, the more we want to know.

Leave a Reply